BEAT’s Blog

Guess what! You know that nice, new grassy area that the City was in such a hurry to put in at Wahconah Park, just outside the stadium? The work that BEAT complained was being done against existing environmental regulations? That grassy area is going to be torn up soon by the City. It seems a storm-drain pipe under Wahconah will have to be dug up so that a new one can be put in. The new grassy area (already dead from being constantly under water) and the new pavement that the City just put in are about to be torn up by the City.

The interesting thing is that the City had planned this storm-drain work before they started the work at Wahconah. In other words, the City performed the work at Wahconah knowing that it would just have to be undone by a later City project. As a matter of fact, the state certificate to perform the work at Wahconah “strongly encouraged” the City to coordinate these two projects. BEAT pointed this out to the City at an open meeting before the work at Wahconah Park started. But the funds were available, so they did the work anyway. Your tax dollars at work. It’s amazing how many problems could be solved just by following existing laws and regulations, but our leaders always seem to have a better idea. I’m just glad we didn’t need any of that wasted money for other things, like social services. We didn’t, did we?

If you have been following BEAT’s Blog, you know that we have a few themes.

1. All BEAT asks is that the City of Pittsfield follow existing laws and regulations.

2. The Pittsfield Conservation Commission does a poor job of protecting Pittsfield’s lakes, rivers, streams, and other wetlands.

3. The purpose of Pittsfield City Government seems to be to take in tax money and grant money and control its distribution.

All three points came into focus for me recently as I looked at two engineering plans related to the work being done at Pittsfield’s own water theme park; Wahconah Park. Read more…

To say Wahconah Park was flooded last week would be an understatement. People were actually kayaking and swimming in the parking lot. I guess even pumping the overflow into nearby wetlands (which the City of Pittsfield has done) couldn’t help. Of course, it wasn’t just Wahconah Park that was flooded. Pittsfield is seeing an unprecedented amount of flooding. Can anything be done? BEAT has been saying for some time now that the Pittsfield Conservation Commission does a poor job of protecting the city from flooding. Read more…

In my last posting, I suggested that perhaps the Pittsfield Conservation Commission was relying too heavily on the expertise of the applicants who come before them for advice on regulatory and technical issues.  In this posting I would like to propose a solution to the problem.

Pittsfield’s Conservation Commission holds hearings every three weeks to consider applications for permits to perform work in and around wetlands.  Although the commissioners are asked to familiarize themselves with the relevant regulations, primarily the Wetlands Protection Act, it is understandable that members of the commission, who are volunteers, sometimes find themselves in over their heads.

This is why the City of Pittsfield has provided the commission with a full-time (37.5 hours-per-week) technical consultant who has a background in environmental science.  This salaried city employee with a degree in environmental science is supposed to be the commission’s go-to guy.  So how is this working?  Read more…

A few months ago enginneer James Scalise, representing Valley Mill Corporation, appeared before the Pittsfield Conservation Commission. He was there because Bonded Concrete wanted to build and operate a cement plant in Pittsfield, and since Valley Mill already had been issued a permit to operate a waste transfer station at the same site, couldn’t they just amend Valley Mill’s permit and avoid all those tedious delays and reviews. The commission said “fine with us.” How this was allowed to happen is an exercise in dysfunctional civics. Read more…

I recently toured the facilities of County Concrete in Dalton. I’m not the easiest person to please environmentally, but I have to say, County Concrete’s operation impressed me. Their chemicals are behind double-walled structures in case of spills or leaks, their trucks are washed down before they are allowed to go out on the roads, and the water from the wash is captured in such a way as to protect the nearby stream. County Concrete has been a Dalton-Pittsfield business for a long time. They’ve recently been purchased by a larger parent company, but they are still under the same local control.

So why is it that the City of Pittsfield is bending environmental rules to the point of breaking in order to allow an out-of-state competitor to move in right across the street from County Concrete? Read more…

In an earlier post on this blog I described how the City of Pittsfield received a permit from the Pittsfield Conservation Commission for work to be done at Wahconah Park, and how the City then put a different plan out to bid. Erik Hoffner read this blog and sent members of the Berkshire Grassroots Network an email with a link to it. Deanna Ruffer, Pittsfield’s Director of Community Development, responded to this email, suggesting that BEAT’s blog contains errors and that readers should contact her for the facts. Jeff Turner of Pittsfield was one of the recipients of this email and did, in fact, contact Deanna Ruffer and she replied. In her reply, Deanna Ruffer apparently agrees that the two plans are different, but says that this is a result of the city choosing to proceed with only parts of the project and not others.

This might sound logical, but it has problems on two fronts. First, it’s not really logical. And second, even if it were logical, it would still be a violation of the conditions of the permit granted to the city by the Conservation Commission. Read more…

Deanna Ruffer, Pittsfield’s Director of Community Development is concerned. She has sent an email to Orion’s Berkshire Grassroots Network telling its members that BEAT’s blog is not factual and that people should contact her for the facts. We make mistakes. We’re human. But the city can make mistakes too. We’ve sent an email to Pittsfield Mayor Ruberto asking for a public meeting. We can all put our documents on the table, and maybe we can all come to agreement on the facts. Let’s talk.

Everybody knows that BEAT keeps a close eye on the Pittsfield Conservation Commission. It’s no exaggeration to say that we know the regulations related to the Wetlands Protection Act better than the conservation commissioners sworn to enforce it. So if the City of Pittsfield wanted to slip one of its own projects past our eyes and the eyes of other members of the community, how might they do it? How about this idea. Present one set of plans to the Pittsfield Conservation Commission for public review, but then actually build something else. Read more…

In my last post, I told the story of how the City of Pittsfield decided that instead of having Jim Bouton and Chip Elitzer fund the reconstruction of a renovated Wahconah Park, the City should do it themselves with taxpayer money. My impression is that this allows the money involved in the project to go to the “right” people. The City waited for Jim and Chip to spend lots of money on plans and designs, waited for them to get the necessary permits, and then usurped the project without so much as removing the name of Jim’s and Chip’s business from the plans. When Chip sent the City a cease-and-desist notice forbidding them from using the plans that had been funded privately, Pittsfield said it wasn’t using the plans or permits. But the City had just filed for an amendment to the permit (Jim’s and Chip’s permit) which uses Jim’s and Chip’s plans and designs as its basis.

One of BEAT’s environmental complaints regarding this project began when we noticed piles of fill in Wahconah Park’s parking lot, right near the stadium’s chain link fence. Anyone who knows the area knows that this parking lot floods every year, because the parking lot is actually part of the Housatonic River from time to time. In fact, the piles of fill were soon under water. This is a violation of wetlands laws. The City was required to obtain a wetlands permit to put those piles there, because at least some of the fill could easily end up in the Housatonic River. Did the City get a permit that allowed them to put piles of fill in the river? Well, it depends on when you ask them and which answer they think the situation calls for. Read more…